Legal Opinion

Hale v. Massachusetts Parking Authority

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 30, 1970PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTauro, C.J.

In this action of contract or tort the plaintiff had a verdict which was recorded under leave reserved. On motion of the defendant a verdict for the defendant was entered subject to the plaintiff’s exception. This presents the sole issue in the case.

The evidence is summarized: The plaintiff was a monthly parker in the defendant’s garage and as such, he made monthly payments. He was furnished with a decal to be exhibited on the vehicle to identify his status each time he left the garage. As an additional security measure he was given a porker’s plate to display upon leaving. The plaintiff was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. D. A. Schulte, Inc. v. North Terminal Garage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Doherty v. ErnstMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Greenberg v. Shoppers' Garage, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  4. Bean v. Security Fur Storage Warehouse, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  5. Butler v. Bowdoin Square Garage, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Parslow v. Pilgrim Parking, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
  2. American Auto Sales, Inc. v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
  3. Sewall v. Fitz-Inn Auto Parks, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
  4. Richard v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
  5. Commodore Leasing, Inc. v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API