United States v. Icardi
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
KEECH, District Judge.
This court now has for determination whether the Government has proved that the questions which the indictment charges the defendant Icardi answered falsely were asked by “a competent tribunal” and whether his answers related to a “material matter.” These two facts are essential elements of the offense with which the defendant is here charged. Hence, although matters of law for determination by the court, they must be proved by the Government like any other essential element of the crime; and the court must grant defendant’s motion to dismiss unless it finds the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sinclair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- McGrain v. DaughertySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Quinn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Eisler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
- Fraser v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
3Cited by35 opinions
- United States v. MandujanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sherrie Bursey and Brenda Joyce Presley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Bernard J. Coven and James F. O'COnnOrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Hyman WinterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- United States v. David H. MooreCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.