Legal Opinion
United States v. Hensel
District Court, D. Maine
Decided March 23, 1981No. Crim. 80-00030 PPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO SUPPRESS
GIGNOUX, Chief Judge.
Nine defendants are charged in a one-count indictment with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to import into the United States approximately 18.7 tons of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 963. Presently before the Court is the motion to suppress evidence filed by all defendants, other than defendant David Keith Hensel, pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 12(b)(3) and 41. 1 An evidentiary hearing has been held, the issues have been comprehensively briefed and argued by counsel, and the…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. ManbeckCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. HenselCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- United States v. David T. Lace, Roger R. Ducharme, Gary D. Butts, Patricia Eckman, and Glenn PollackCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- State v. DickersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- People v. TaorminaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.