Legal Opinion

State v. Dellinger

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 2, 1985No. 8427SC873PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

I

This appeal presents an issue of first impression: whether a horse is a vehicle for the purpose of charging a violation of G.S. 20-138.1? We hold that it is.

G.S. 20-138.1 provides in pertinent part:

A person commits the offense of impaired driving if he drives any vehicle upon any highway, any street, or any public vehicular area within this state . . . [w]hile under the influence of any impairing substance; or . . . [a]fter having consumed sufficient alcohol that he has, at any relevant time after the driving, an alcohol concentration of 0.10 or more. [Emphasis added.]

Defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. State v. CokerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. HowrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Conrad v. DillingerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  5. Watson Ex Rel. Watson v. StallingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Byus v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Byus v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. Canterbury Estates Homeowners Ass'n v. NorrisStafford County Circuit Court · 1999
  4. State v. EutonPortsmouth Municipal Court · 1996
  5. State v. Wimpfeimer, No. Mv98-0283532 (Mar. 15, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API