Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 16, 1987No. C82-06-35828, C86-09-34330 CA A42784 (Control), A42785PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction, following a stipulated facts trial to the court, for being an ex-convict in possession of a firearm. ORS 166.270. He also appeals the subsequent reinstatement of his prison sentence and revocation of his probation on an earlier forgery in the first degree conviction. The sole issue with respect to both appeals is whether the sawed-off shotgun that defendant admits to having had in his possession is a “firearm capable of being concealed upon the person,” as that phrase is used in ORS 166.270(1). We affirm.

ORS 166.270(1) provides, in part:

“Any person who has…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. ClipstonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  2. Beaver v. PelettOregon Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SumerlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. State v. WrisleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. State v. WolfsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API