Legal Opinion
Rappold v. Snorac, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 21, 2001No. Appeal No. 7PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order and judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and new trial granted on damages for past and future pain and suffering and future medical and life care expenses unless plaintiffs, within 20 days of service of a copy of the order of this Court with notice of entry, stipulate to reduce the verdict for past pain and suffering to $1 million, for future pain and suffering to $6 million, and for future medical and life care expenses to $8 million, in which event the order and judgment is modified accordingly and as modified affirmed without costs and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Derdiarian v. Felix Contracting Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Gordon v. Eastern Railway Supply, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Caristo v. SanzoneNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Bryant v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Nowlin v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Reed v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- ARG Trucking Corp. v. Amerimart Development Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Greenwell v. MoodyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Harding v. OnibokunNew York Supreme Court · 2006
- Rappold v. Snorac, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001