Legal Opinion

Speach v. Bouchard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 28, 2001Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted the motion of third-party defendants, Town of Schroeppel (Town) and Neil Candee, the Town’s employee, seeking summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint for contribution (see, Guereschi v Bouchard, 286 AD2d 997 [decided herewith]). The contention of third-party plaintiffs that the Town and Candee are liable pursuant to General Municipal Law §§ 50-a and 50-b for the negligence of Candee is raised for the first time on appeal and therefore is not properly before us (see, Ciesinski v *999Town of Aurora,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ciesinski v. Town of AuroraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Guereschi v. BouchardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API