Legal Opinion

Fragosa v. Eyman

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 13, 1966No. 2 CA-HC 28PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRUCKER, Chief Judge.

Petitioner, Joe Fragosa, having filed a motion for rehearing from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, raises the question of interpretation and application of A.R.S. § 31-251. This statute provides in part:

“B. Every prisoner faithfully performing such labor and conforming in all respects to the rules, or if unable to work, but complying in all respects to the rules, shall be allowed, if a first offender, from the minimum term of his sentence, or, if a second offender or more, from the maximum term of his sentence, a deduction of two months in each of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Orme v. RogersArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Beaty v. ShuteArizona Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rabon v. State Ex Rel. EymanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  2. Davis v. State ex rel. EymanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  3. Jones v. State ex rel. EymanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API