Legal Opinion
United States v. Blackwell
District Court, W.D. South Carolina
Decided February 16, 1965No. Civ. A. No. 4275PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEMPHILL, District Judge.
Motions to dismiss the action on grounds that Second Amended Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief could be had precipitate the Court’s consideration. Rule 12(b) (6), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, confers authority and direction.
Original action seeks recovery from minor defendant (of which defendant Bank is guardian and E. Randolph Stone is Guardian ad Litem) of Social Security benefits alleged to have been paid to minor after his adoption by Glenn A. Blackwell, great uncle, in April 1957. Undisputed facts disclose that the minor is the child of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Towson Price v. Arthur S. Flemming, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, and Westinghouse Electric Corp., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Jean A. Kilby, on Her Own Behalf and on Behalf of Jane L. Kilby v. Marion D. Folsom, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- Campbell v. CampbellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
- Price v. FolsomDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1959
- Knapczyk v. RibicoffDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Groseclose v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Groseclose v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Strann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983