Legal Opinion
Milton D. Goldenberg and Immunomedics, Inc. v. Cytogen, Inc. And C.R. Bard, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 23, 2004No. 03-1409PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge GAJARSA. Opinion concurring-in-part and dissenting-in-part filed by Circuit Judge PROST.
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
Milton D. Goldenberg (“Goldenberg”) and Immunomedics, Inc. (collectively, “Im-munomedics”), appeal from the grant of a motion for summary judgment of nonin-fringement of United States Patent No. 4,460,559 (the “'559 patent”) in favor of Cytogen, Inc., and C.R. Bard, Inc. (collectively, “Cytogen”), by the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. Goldenberg v. Cytogen, Inc., 2003 WL 22454399, No. 00-763(AET) (D.N.J. Apr.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Apple Inc. v. Motorola, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Pfizer, Inc. v. Ranbaxy Laboratories, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Genuine Enabling Technology v. Nintendo Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
- Canady v. Erbe Elektromedizin GmbHDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Nextec Applications v. BROOKWOOD COMPANIES, INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.