National Solar Salt Works v. Wemyss
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Saline District Court. Action by Wemyss to recover upon certain promissory notes given by the Salt Worhs to him. Among other things set up in defense, the defendant alleged that plaintiff obtained the notes by certain fraudulent representations. Trial at the May Term, 1886; verdict for plaintiff; judgment thereon for $6,594.50 and costs. The defendant brings the case here. The opinion contains a sufficient statement of the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Simpson, C.:
We shall take notice only of the specific errors complained of in the brief of counsel of plaintiff in error. If there are other errors in the record, they should have been called to the attention of the court here, as well as *483to that of the trial court. It is contended that among other defenses urged on the trial, the main one was, that the notes had been obtained by Wemyss through false and fraudulent representations, and this was the principal question passed upon by the jury. There was a verdict and a judgment on the notes for $6,594.50 and costs. The court charged…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Woodman v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
- Quinlan, Montgomery & Co. v. DanfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
3Cited by2 opinions
- Shawnee Nat. Bank v. Wootten & PottsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- McConnell v. HoldermanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909