Legal Opinion

State v. Pearson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 21, 2001No. COA00-647PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Judge.

Defendant, Marion Edward Pearson, appeals after pleading guilty as part of a plea agreement to two counts of second-degree rape. All of his assignments of error concern the trial court’s denial of his pretrial motions to suppress evidence.

Defendant based those motions on three grounds. First, he argues evidence resulting from a non-testimonial identification order (NIO) more than twelve years prior to his arrest should have been suppressed by the trial court due to statutory violations after it was obtained. Second, defendant argues evidence from the NIO should have been…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Davis v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Murray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. State v. HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Singleton v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McFadyen v. Duke UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2011
  2. People v. WarnerColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. State v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API