Legal Opinion
Bushnell Corp. v. ITT Corp.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided July 18, 1997No. 96-2511-JWLPublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.
In this action, plaintiff has asserted numerous causes of action against defendant, including. antitrust, defamation, and tortious interference claims. Those three specific claims are the subject of defendant’s present motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c) (Doc. 57). For the reasons set forth below, the court grants the motion with respect to plaintiffs antitrust and tortious interference with contract claims, and defendant is hereby awarded judgment on those counts. The court denies the motion with respect to…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Fisher v. LynchDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2008
- Swimwear Solution, Inc. v. Orlando Bathing Suit, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2018
- Davis Ex Rel. Davis v. Ford Motor Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Fair Isaac Corp. v. Experian Information Solutions Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- In Re Indep. Serv. Organizations Antitrust Lit.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.