Legal Opinion

Scheibel v. Hillis

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 25, 1978No. 38981PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Presiding Judge.

This is the second appeal of this case. This appeal has its origin in the proceeding had prior to the first appeal. A review of those proceedings is necessary to our consideration on this appeal. Plaintiff brought an action for personal injuries against Betty Hillis (Hillis) and Richard Joyner (Joyner). The trial court sustained Hillis’ separate motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The court did not enter an order making the dismissal a final judgment for the purpose of appeal. Thereafter default and inquiry was granted…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Scheibel v. HillisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Hoelzel v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  3. Yarrington v. LiningerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. Dotson v. E. W. Bacharach, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  5. Ferguson v. TurnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1842

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Speck v. Union Electric Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  2. Mercantile Trust Co., NA v. HarperMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Gant v. HanksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Burtrum v. U-Haul Co. of Southern MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Ferguson v. GinnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API