Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of McCahill

California Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1915No. L. A. No. 4098PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

In this case the administrator with the will annexed appeals from an order of the superior court charging the estate of the decedent in the hands of said administrator with inheritance tax amounting to $1,433.21.

MeCahill died on July 21, 1911, in the state of Minnesota, being, at the time of his death and for many years prior thereto, a resident of that state. For some years, because of feeble health, it had been his custom to spend his winters in California, He was the owner of a number of bonds issued by corporations for the payment of money, and he usually brought these with him,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re the Appraisal for Taxation of the Property of BronsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. In Re the Appraisal for Taxation of the Estate of WhitingNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Murphy v. CrouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. People v. Home Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Estate of FairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. City of TallahasseeSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  2. State ex rel. Bankers' Trust Co. v. WalkerMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Danon v. FlournoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API