Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Hubble v. Hubble

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, C. J.

1-3. The only documents introduced in the proceedings to determine the question of contempt are the motion of attorney for plaintiff supported by his. affidavit, the order directing the arrest of defendant and the order committing defendant, all of which are dated on the same day, to wit: May 19, 1928. Defendant was not given an opportunity to be heard upon the question of his ability to obey the order of the court directing him to pay to the court the sum of $175 for the referee. The only proceedings regarding that were had in the divorce suit. That suit is collateral to this proceeding.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. DowningOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  2. State v. La FolletteOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. State v. FrancisOregon Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hewson v. HewsonOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State ex rel. Hodes v. HodesOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. State ex rel. Robertson v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API