Legal Opinion

Edwards v. State of Oklahoma

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided July 10, 2025No. 5:25-cv-00434Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA CARL DEAN EDWARDS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. CIV-25-434-R ) STATE OF OKLAHOMA, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Plaintiff, proceeding in forma pauperis, has filed a pro se civil rights Complaint. Pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), the Court has screened Plaintiff’s Complaint and finds that it fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) requires a pleading to contain “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” This requirement…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Nasious v. Two Unknown B.I.C.E. AgentsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API