Legal Opinion · Dissent

What Cheer Savings Bank v. Mowery

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 26, 1910Published

Appeal from Keokuk District Court. — Hon. W. G. Clements, Judge. Action at law. The material facts will be found stated in the opinion.

1DissentDeemer, C. J.

(dissenting). — In my opinion the majority have made and decided a case not presented to the court below, nor argued here. Moreover, the case so made is not sustained by sufficient testimony, and as I view it, the decision of the lower court upon the issues and testimony adduced should be reversed. The case is simply this:

Mowery purchased, hogs, issuing checks therefor upon the Central Savings Bank. These checks were paid by the bank. He shipped a car load of hogs to T. M. Sinclair & Co. at Cedar Kapids, Iowa, taking a live stock contract showing shipment to the Sinclair Company. He drew a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Scharff v. MeyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  2. Wigton v. BowleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  3. First National Bank v. Mount Pleasant Milling Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  4. Kentucky Refining Co. v. Globe Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  5. Willman Mercantile Co. v. FussyMontana Supreme Court · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API