Legal Opinion

Willman Mercantile Co. v. Fussy

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1895PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Fourth Judicial District, Missoula County. Action for goods sold. Defendant’s motion for a nonsuit was granted by Brantley, J. Statement of the case by the justice delivering the opinion: Plaintiff sues the defendant for the balance due on a carload of apples, sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendant about October, 1891. Defendant denies the sale and delivery, or any balance due to plaintiff, and sets up that about November, 1891, the apples, as property of…

Read the full summary

Appeal from Fourth Judicial District, Missoula County. Action for goods sold. Defendant’s motion for a nonsuit was granted by Brantley, J. Statement of the case by the justice delivering the opinion: Plaintiff sues the defendant for the balance due on a carload of apples, sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendant about October, 1891. Defendant denies the sale and delivery, or any balance due to plaintiff, and sets up that about November, 1891, the apples, as property of plaintiff, were delivered to defendant, to be sold on commission for plaintiff. The defendant sold the same, and, after…

1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.

— The question to decide is whether or not, under the facts, tile district court correctly held that the title to the apples, and the control over them, remained in the plaintiff, vendor, or passed to the defendant as vendee.

From the statement settled by the judge, and the evidence in the record, it appears that about October 31, 1891, at St. Joseph, Missouri, through one Brown, a broker, acting for defendant at Missoula, Montana, plaintiff received an order for a carload of apples of a designated bind. Brown offered a price which plaintiff accepted, “free on board cars at St. Joseph,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dows v. National Exchange Bank of MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Farmers and Mechanics' Nat. Bank v. . LoganNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. McCormick & Richardson v. Joseph & AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  4. Moors v. . KidderNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  5. Sohn v. JervisIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Distillery v. Stromberg-Mullins Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Mette & Kanne Distilling Co. v. LowreyMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Cragun Bros. v. Todd & KraftSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  5. Shaw-Spears Gin Co. v. Apache Cotton Oil & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API