Legal Opinion

Riotto v. Van Houten

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 28, 1989PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

235 N.J. Super. 177 (1989)

561 A.2d 1168

JOSEPH RIOTTO AND CATHERINE FANELLI, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

EUGENE VAN HOUTEN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted April 18, 1989.

Decided April 28, 1989.

Before Judges DREIER and BROCHIN.

Spector & Dimin, attorneys for appellants (William N. Dimin, on the brief).

Hartmann, Brooks & Van Dam, attorneys for respondent (Michael P. O'Rourke, on the brief).

2Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal from a decision by Judge Eichen in the Special Civil Part dismissing plaintiff's complaint for summary dispossession. In 1981 plaintiffs were in…

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Enfield v. FWL, INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  2. 809-811 WASHINGTON STREET ASSO. v. GregoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  3. Amato v. PelligriniNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
  4. Market Dundee Corp. v. JaramilloNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API