Riotto v. Van Houten
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
235 N.J. Super. 177 (1989)
561 A.2d 1168
JOSEPH RIOTTO AND CATHERINE FANELLI, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
EUGENE VAN HOUTEN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted April 18, 1989.
Decided April 28, 1989.
Before Judges DREIER and BROCHIN.
Spector & Dimin, attorneys for appellants (William N. Dimin, on the brief).
Hartmann, Brooks & Van Dam, attorneys for respondent (Michael P. O'Rourke, on the brief).
2Per curiam
Plaintiffs appeal from a decision by Judge Eichen in the Special Civil Part dismissing plaintiff's complaint for summary dispossession. In 1981 plaintiffs were in…
3Cited by4 opinions
- Enfield v. FWL, INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- 809-811 WASHINGTON STREET ASSO. v. GregoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- Amato v. PelligriniNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Market Dundee Corp. v. JaramilloNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990