Legal Opinion

Casino Ventures v. Stewart

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided October 16, 1998No. 2:98-1923-18PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

NORTON, District Judge.

Oh, we got trouble—

Right here in Georgetouni County.

We’ve surely got trouble—

Right here in Georgetoum County.

Oh yes we got trouble here,

We got big, big trouble.

With a capital “T”—

And that rhymes with “G”

And that stands for gambling. 1

This case arises out of Plaintiffs intention to operate a “day cruise” or “cruise to no where” business in Georgetown County, South Carolina. After denying Plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction, this court held a bench trial on September 14, 1998. At the conclusion of the trial and in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a), this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Randall v. LoftsgaardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. North Beach Amusement Company, Inc., a Body Corporate v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stardancer Casino, Inc. v. StewartSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Casino Ventures v. Robert M. Stewart, in His Official Capacity as Chief of the State Law Enforcement Division Charles M. Condon, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  3. Stardancer Casino, Inc. v. StewartSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  4. Stardancer Casino, Inc. v. StewartSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API