Legal Opinion

In re Katz

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 5, 1970No. 8372PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlmond, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claims 1-9 of appellent’s application entitled “Coupled Cargo Van Containers.”1 No claims have been allowed.

The invention relates to containerized cargo vans for hauling freight by sea, rail, air or highway transportation. Two or more cargo containers are coupled together end-to-end. As a result of the transmission of tension, compression, and shear forces from container to container, there is produced a rigidly coupled unit which is capable of being lifted or supported without auxiliary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Application of Josef FriedCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. Millar v. MillarWyoming Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Application of Arthur A. HellbaumCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  4. Katz v. LaddDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1965
  5. Solomon Katz v. David L. Ladd, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Amgen, Inc., and Ortho Biotech, Inc., Omj Pharmaceutical, Inc. And Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Genetics Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  2. Amgen, Inc. v. Genetics Institute, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
  3. In re ClarkCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API