Legal Opinion

Cobb v. . Harmon

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1861PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

If it be conceded that the performance of the condition of the defendants' bond became impossible by the non-attendance of the County Judge at the time and place appointed for making the application therein mentioned, and thereby agreed to be made, they are nevertheless liable.

It is a settled rule of law that where a party by his own contract absolutely engages to do an act, or creates a duty or charge upon himself, he is bound to make it good notwithstanding any accident or other contingency not foreseen by or within the control of the party, unless its performance is rendered impossible by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Beebe v. JohnsonNew York Supreme Court · 1838

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Amarillo Oil Co. v. Ranch Creek Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Lehigh Portland Cement Co. v. Virginia Steamship Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1922
  3. Town of North Hempstead v. Public Service Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Froehlich v. K. W. W. Holding Co.New York Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Wheaton v. . FayNew York Court of Appeals · 1875

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API