Legal Opinion

John Badea v. Harvey Cox

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 25, 1991No. 89-55638PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

931 F.2d 573

John BADEA, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Harvey COX, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 89-55638.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 5, 1990.

Decided April 25, 1991.

John Badea, in pro per.

Frederick M. Brosio, Jr., and Katherine M. Lunsford, Asst. U.S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

Before PREGERSON, REINHARDT and HALL, Circuit Judges.

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

1

Badea, a former inmate of the Federal Prison Camp at Lompoc, California, brought a civil rights action…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Olim v. WakinekonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. (HC) Bisel v. FisherDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  2. (HC) Driver v. DellostrittoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  3. (HC) Hubbard v. GipsonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  4. (HC) Staich v. BOP Parole CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. (HC) Staich v. BOP Parole CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API