Legal Opinion
Camilo-Robles v. Hoyos
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided July 22, 1998No. 19-1802PublishedCited by 252 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
After suffering indignities at the hands of an unstable police officer, plaintiff-appellee Gran'cid Camilo-Robles sued an array of defendants under 42 U.S.C. § Í983 (1994). 1 In due season, five such defendants, appellants here, moved for summary judgment on the ground of qualified immunity. The district court rejected their motions (in some instances without waiting for an opposition). Although the timing of the district court’s ruling and the lack of any authoritative insight into the court’s reasoning complicate our task, we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
Parking privileges…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by252 opinions
- Sain v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Rogan v. MeninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Estate of Davis Ex Rel. McCully v. City of North Richland HillsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Ramirez-Lluveras v. Rivera-MercedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- Peggy Poe v. John Leonard, Defendant-Third Party-Plaintiff-Appellant, Douglas Pearl, State of Connecticut, Third-Party-DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
247 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.