Legal Opinion
Indiana Bell Telephone Co. v. Office of Utility Consumer Counselor
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 14, 1999No. 93A02-9801-EX-22PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTINGLY, Judge
Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a Ameritech Indiana (“Ameritech”) appeals the Final Order on Interim Relief entered by the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (the “Commission”) on December 30, 1997. The Office of Utility Consumer Counsel (the “OUCC”) 1 cross-appeals. 2 This case requires our interpretation of the Commission’s authority and responsibility under Ind.Code § 8-1-2.6-1 et seq. (“the Alternative Regulation Statute”), which was enacted to promote competition in the provision of telephone services. We consolidate and restate the issues raised on…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Public Service Commission v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
- City of Evansville v. Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Perez v. United States Steel Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1981
- Velma E. Carr v. James F. Runyan, Elbert Starks, Jr., Linda K. Bloom, Individually and as Auditor of Allen County, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- General Motors Corp. v. Northrop Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana, Inc. v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Nextel West Corp. v. Indiana Utility Regulatory CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Indiana Bell Telephone Co. v. Office of Utility Consumer CounselorIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Indiana Bell Telephone Co. v. Indiana Utility Regulatory CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006