Legal Opinion

Brodnik v. Lanham

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided March 30, 2018No. 1:11-cv-00178Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BLUEFIELD RANDY MICHAEL BRODNIK, D.O., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:11-0178 ROBERT LANHAM, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the court are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment as to Count I of plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint. (ECF Nos. 101 and 105). For the reasons discussed below, defendant’s motion (ECF No. 105)1 is GRANTED and plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 101) is DENIED.2 I. Background According to the Second Amended Complaint, at the time of the events giving…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API