Legal Opinion
Abendschein v. Montgomery County, Md.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided November 4, 1997No. CIV. A. AW-96-3392PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILLIAMS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs commenced this action against Defendant alleging violation of the maximum hours provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 207. Presently before the Court are cross motions for summary judgment. No hearing is deemed necessary. Local Rule 105.6 (D.Md.). For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment as to liability, and will refer the issue of damages to a United States Magistrate Judge.
Factual Background 1
Each plaintiff is, or has at some time since January 1, 1993, been…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carter v. Countrywide Credit Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2002
- Bertrand v. CHILDREN'S HOMEDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2007
- Lauren Millstein v. County of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2023