Legal Opinion
United States v. Ram Kumar Singh
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided May 15, 2002No. 01-11398, 01-11399PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARD MILLS, District Judge:
Posit: In order for a defendant to receive a two-level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2F1,1(b)(6)(B), must the defendant personally commit a substantial part of the fraudulent scheme from outside of the United States?
We think not, and therefore, affirm Defendant’s sentence.
I. BACKGROUND
From July 1998 to May 2000, Ram Ku-mar Singh (a/k/a Rajiv Singh), along with his co-conspirators in Kuwait, engaged in a “call sell” scheme to defraud AT&T, Bell South, and other long distance and local telephone service providers.
Generally, the scheme worked like this: Singh…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. DunniganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. GalloCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Jeffrey Allen KoonceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- United States v. Brenton-FarleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. EllisorCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Anthony RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Amadou Fall NdiayeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.