Legal Opinion

Greg R. Barringer and Judith M. Barringer v. Michael D. Griffes

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 9, 1993No. 857, Docket 92-9062PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge:

Appellants on this appeal wanted to register and operate an automobile in Vermont that they had purchased in another state. Vermont’s motor vehicle tax scheme imposes a use tax on automobiles; at the same time it grants a credit against the use tax for any sales tax paid to Vermont. Due to the credit, most Vermonters never have to pay the use tax. Non-residents moving to Vermont find themselves in quite a different situation. They are not credited against the use tax for any sales tax they paid in their former state of residence. Instead, they might pay a sales tax in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Cooley v. Board of Wardens of Port of Philadelphia Ex Rel. Soc. for Relief of Distressed PilotsSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  3. Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. DiasSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. New Energy Co. of Indiana v. LimbachSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  2. Maryland State Comptroller of the Treasury v. WynneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  3. Rhoade v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 2002
  4. Christensen v. GriffesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  5. Murray v. McDonaldDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API