Legal Opinion
Mingus v. Condit
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided February 15, 1873PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Argued on final hearing, upon bill, answer, and proofs.
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
In March, 1865, lands in Newark, the premises in question in this suit, were conveyed in fee to Nathan Mingus, subject to a previous mortgage to the executors of II. C. Jones, for §3000, which Mingus assumed to pay. On the 24th day of May, 1866, Mingus being in failing circuni*314stances, for the purpose of delaying and defrauding'his creditors, by deed of that date conveyed these lands to his mother, Margaret Mingus. This deed was left by Nathan on the same day at the office of the clerk of Essex county, and duly recorded. Margarget Mingus did not know of the execution of the deed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Root v. FrenchNew York Supreme Court · 1835
- Dickerson v. TillinghastNew York Court of Chancery · 1833
- Padgett v. LawrenceNew York Court of Chancery · 1843
- Manhattan Co. v. EvertsonNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
- Jessup v. HulseNew York Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rutherford Nat. Bank v. H.R. Bogle Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- Bd. of Education of Elizabeth v. ZincNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
- Arnesto Paint Co. v. BrushNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
- Bajek v. PolackNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936