Pearson v. Component Technology Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Chief Judge.
The Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act of 1988 (the WARN Act), 29 U.S.C. § 2101 et seq., mandates that employers provide workers with 60 days’ notice (subject to certain exceptions not at issue in this appeal) prior to a plant closing or mass layoff, and allows various remedies for workers when closures are not preceded by the requisite notification. Because a plant closure often presages a corporation’s demise, leaving workers with no source of satisfaction from their employer, plaintiffs have frequently sought damages from affiliated…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Robert H. E. Frank, Jerry D. Mooberry, Tyrone G. Moreno v. U.S. West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pearson v. Component Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Citizens United To Protect Our Neighborhoods v. Village of Chestnut Ridge, New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- SEVEN SPRINGS MOUNTAIN RESORT, INC. v. HESSDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022