Legal Opinion

Trien v. CROASDALE CONST. CO., INC.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 1, 1994No. WD 47178, WD 47223PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Judge.

Plaintiffs, Joseph and Linda Trien, contracted with defendant, Croasdale Construction Co., for the construction of a new residence in Parkville, Missouri, on a lot in a subdivision being developed by Croasdale. The contract for the construction of the house consisted of three documents — the basic contract, a document entitled “Description of Materials,” and blue prints and drawings of the house.

After the house was completed by Croas-dale, plaintiffs moved into the house. They discovered two defects in the house. The alleged defects were, first, that the septic tank would not…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Smith v. Old Warson Development CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  2. Kincaid Enterprises, Inc. v. PorterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Harris v. Union Electric Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  4. Hotchner v. LiebowitsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. Clayton Brokerage Co. of St. Louis v. PillaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Harris v. DeSistoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Gage v. MorseMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Thomas Host v. BNSF Railway CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Nestlé Purina Petcare Co. v. Blue Buffalo Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2016
  5. Lynch v. Helm Plumbing & Electrical Contractors, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API