Core VCT PLC v. Hensley
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs have filed objections to the January 26, 2015 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Alan Kay (“R & R”) [ECF No. 26], which recommends that plaintiffs’ suit be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (See Def. James Hensley’s Mot. to Dismiss Pis.’ Compl. Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) [ECF No. 4] (“Def.’s SMJ Mot.”).) For the reasons set forth below, the Court rejects plaintiffs’ objections and will dismiss their suit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
BACKGROUND
The facts and procedural history of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Freeport-McMoRan Inc. v. K N Energy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- TEXAS v. FLORIDA Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rosado v. Adorno-DelgadoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2024