Legal Opinion

Williams v. Pure Oil Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 2, 1932No. 10970PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, C. J.

This suit was instituted in the district court of Van Zandt county by plaintiffs in error, in the form of trespass to try title, to recover one-tenth interest in 132.8 acres of land against those claiming to be the owners of the entire fee, and against the Pure Oil Company, claiming to be the owner of a mineral lease of the entire tract, for a one-tenth net interest in the value of the oil taken from producing wells on the land. There are also made parties defendant a number of other persons and corporations, some of whom claim royalty in the oil and minerals taken from the land, and others…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Moody v. ButlerTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Olsen v. GrelleTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  3. Gallup v. County of LibertyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  4. C. C. Slaughter Cattle Co. v. Potter CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Logan v. Stephens CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Williams v. Pure Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Moore v. KnightTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Mauritz v. ThatcherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  4. Radford v. GarzaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Vaughan v. KieslingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API