Legal Opinion

Neal & Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided September 17, 1987No. 57-85CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SMITH, Chief Judge.

This case is before the court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The court grants defendant’s motion because there are no genuine issues of material fact and the United States is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. This opinion follows an oral ruling given to the parties on March 26, 1987. The Claims Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (1982), and the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613 (1982).

Facts

This case arises out of a contract between Neal and Company, Inc., (Neal) and *283the United…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Jackson Jordan, Inc. v. Plasser American Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  3. Stone v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. SMS Data Products Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  2. G & H Machinery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  3. DWS, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API