Legal Opinion
Barker v. City of Cincinnati
Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County
Decided April 20, 1933Published
1Opinion of the CourtDarby, J.
The plaintiff in error (herein called the defendant) was convicted in the Municipal Court of Cincinnati, and fined for violation of Section 74-200 of the Code of Ordinances of said city.
The ordinance is as follows:
“It shall be unlawful for any person to demonstrate, sell, or offer for sale, goods, wares, or merchandise, in, upon, or from any portion of a building or structure abutting any sidewalk in the congested district which causes or creates such a gathering of persons on said sidewalk as to interfere with pedestrian traffic thereon.”
The affidavit 'upon which the prosecution was based…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- The Albany Northern Railroad Company v. . BrownellNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Lawder v. StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Banta v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Beacon Oil Co. v. PerelisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Carney v. CarneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.