Legal Opinion

Vad v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided May 5, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01089Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MICHAEL VAD, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 19-C-1089 ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. DECISION AND ORDER Michael Vad, pro se, seeks judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying his claim for disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). For the reasons set forth below, the Commissioner’s decision will be affirmed. BACKGROUND The plaintiff’s disability claim is based on claims of tremors and headaches. He alleged disability…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Donna J. Clifford v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  4. Villano v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  5. Terry Steele v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API