Legal Opinion

Vella v. City Zoning Board of Appeals

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1954PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWitmer, J.

Petitioners are home owners near the premises of intervener-respondent, Rochester Transit Corporation, adjacent to Bast Main Street, G-arson Avenue and Federal Street in the city of Rochester, and they seek the review and annulment of the action of the respondent zoning board of appeals of Rochester in granting to said intervener the right (1) to use its premises on the east side of Federal Street, at the corner of Cedarwood Terrace, as a parking lot for the automobiles of its employees, and (2) to construct extensions on two of its buildings west of Federal Street and south of the houses…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Matter of Reed v. Bd. of Standards AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. People Ex Rel. St. Albans-Springfield Corp. v. ConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Matter of Thomas v. Board of Standards AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. Thomas v. Board of Standards & AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  5. People v. PerkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chad Homes, Inc. v. Board of AppealsNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Libby v. AngevineNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Stuckman v. Kosciusko County Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Brundage v. BorchardNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  5. People v. BonnerwithAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API