Legal Opinion
United States v. Jack Love
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 22, 1979No. 78-1687PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENSON, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Jack Love appeals from his conviction by a jury of one count of violating the Mann Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2421. 1 Love’s primary contention on appeal is that the district court 2 erred in permitting a portion of an unsworn statement given by an unavailable witness to an FBI agent to be read to the jury. We agree and, accordingly, reverse and remand for a new trial.
On June 21, 1978, Love was indicted by a federal grand jury in North Dakota on three counts of violating the Mann Act. Since the indictment was based on a simultaneous transportation, the court required…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Donald Laverne Carlson, United States of America v. Gary Clarend HofstadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Gebardi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. George Samuel Walter RogersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Theodore D. MorlangCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- United States v. Harvey M. RenvilleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Claude Leander RileyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. HelmelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- State v. GoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- United States v. Laurence John LaytonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.