City of Houston v. Hill
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUNN, Justice.
This appeal is from a mandamus proceeding in the trial court. Appellants, the City of Houston (“City”) and city controller George Greanias, contend that the trial court erred in granting a writ of mandamus ordering Greanias to pay appellee Jay Howard Hill $600,780.82 in satisfaction of a judgment Hill took against the City in a separate proceeding. Appellants contend that Greanias had no clear legal duty to pay the judgment, which the City has challenged by filing a petition for bill of review. We hold that Hill failed to sustain his burden of proving his entitlement to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Petro-Chemical Transport, Inc. v. CarrollTexas Supreme Court · 1974
- McGlothlin v. KliebertTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Tice v. City of PasadenaTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- Schwartz v. JeffersonTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- Smith v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.