Legal Opinion

City of Houston v. Hill

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided May 24, 1990No. 01-89-00898-CVPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DUNN, Justice.

This appeal is from a mandamus proceeding in the trial court. Appellants, the City of Houston (“City”) and city controller George Greanias, contend that the trial court erred in granting a writ of mandamus ordering Greanias to pay appellee Jay Howard Hill $600,780.82 in satisfaction of a judgment Hill took against the City in a separate proceeding. Appellants contend that Greanias had no clear legal duty to pay the judgment, which the City has challenged by filing a petition for bill of review. We hold that Hill failed to sustain his burden of proving his entitlement to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Petro-Chemical Transport, Inc. v. CarrollTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  2. McGlothlin v. KliebertTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Tice v. City of PasadenaTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Schwartz v. JeffersonTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Smith v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Houston v. Hill, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API