Legal Opinion

Farner v. Idaho Falls School District No. 91

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 2000No. 25770PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order denying summary judgment to the appellant, Idaho Falls School District No. 91 (“the School District”), and granting summary judgment to the respondents, Mary Farner and Michael Peila (collectively “the Teachers”). The School District also appeals orders denying its motion to dismiss for failure to file a notice of tort claims; denying, in part, its motion to amend the judgment; and granting the respondents injunctive relief.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Mary Farner (Farner) has been a teacher in Idaho Falls School District No. 91 since…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Gilbert v. HomarSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sun Valley Potato Growers, Inc. v. Texas Refinery Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Nation v. State, Dept. of CorrectionIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Gunter v. Murphy's Lounge, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Trimble v. West Virginia Board of DirectorsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Karr v. BermeosoloIdaho Supreme Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API