Legal Opinion

Teahan v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1930No. Docket No. S.F. 13830PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

Joseph D. Teahan, a civil service employee of the city of Oakland, a municipal corporation, sustained injuries to his head and spine when he fell on the steamer “Washington,” at the time tied up at one of the city’s wharves and afloat on navigable waters of the United States. Upon his death several months later his dependents filed an application with the respondent commission for adjustment of claim. The city of Oakland, which is self-insured, opposed the application, contending that the injury was of a maritime character and that, therefore, the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Stats. 1917, p;…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. State Industrial Comm'n of NY v. Nordenholt Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Nogueira v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. T. Smith & Son, Inc. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baskin v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Clark v. Cahill Bros.California Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Vojkovich v. UrsichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Assistance, Inc. v. Teledyne Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API