Legal Opinion

Rosboro Lumber Co. v. Heine

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1980No. 1269, SC 26669PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

Plaintiff petitions for rehearing of our decision in Rosboro Lumber Co. v. Heine et al, 289 Or 909, 618 P2d 960 (1980), in which we denied plaintiff’s claim on the ground that the writ of review is an available remedy in the Oregon Tax Court and that plaintiff’s failure to exercise that remedy within the procedures of ORS 34.030 precluded its use of a writ of mandamus in this case. In seeking a rehearing of this decision plaintiff contends that our decision fails to reconcile ORS 305.425, which states that proceedings in tax court are to be heard de novo, and Oregon case law which states that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Martin Bros. Container & Timber Products Corp. v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Rosboro Lumber Co. v. HeineOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. National Metallurgical Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Adc Kentrox v. Dept. of Rev.Oregon Tax Court · 2006
  2. Wise v. HaysCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API