Legal Opinion

Wise v. Hays

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 3, 1985No. 145,525; CA A33783PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Defendant appeals the issuance of a peremptory writ of mandamus requiring the Board of Parole to conduct a parole consideration hearing for plaintiff. We conclude that the circuit court erred in issuing the writ and quash it. The Board of Parole established plaintiffs parole release date as January, 1986. He did not seek judicial review of that decision, and the time for direct review passed. Subsequently, he petitioned for an alternative writ of mandamus seeking a rehearing, because, he contended, the Parole Board had failed to comply with ORS 144.210 at his earlier hearing. See Smith v.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ricco v. BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Harris v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. State Ex Rel. LeVasseur v. MertenOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Esperum v. Oregon Board of ParoleOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Rosboro Lumber Co. v. HeineOregon Supreme Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Curry v. County of WashingtonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022
  2. Olsten Temporary Services, Inc. v. LiptonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. State ex rel. Eames v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API