Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Palmisano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 19, 2007PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 17, 2006, which ruled, inter alia, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insur*799anee benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant worked as an assistant service representative for the employer from November 23, 1998 through August 25, 2005. During her tenure, she was approved for short-term disability leave but was expected to return to work on June 20, 2005. Claimant was terminated from her position because she did not return to work on the date scheduled or provide…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of BenbowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. In re the Claim of ArmbrusterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. In re the Claim of CooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. In re the Claim of PeguesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of DiazAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API