Legal Opinion

State v. Malloy

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 2002No. S-9754PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Under AS 12.55.125(a)(3), a defendant convicted of first-degree murder must receive an unsuspended term of ninety-nine years without eligibility for parole if the sentencing court "finds by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant subjected the murder vie-tim to substantial physical torture." Does this statute impermissibly subject the defendant to increased punishment for an aggravated class of first-degree murder that has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt to the jury? Because the statute's mandatory sentence falls within the range…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Pease v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2002
  2. Forster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2010
  3. State v. SmartAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Lockuk v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2007
  5. Alaska Legislative Council Ex Rel. Alaska State Legislature v. KnowlesAlaska Supreme Court · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API