Legal Opinion

Kennelly-Murray v. Megill

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 17, 2005PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

FISHER, J.A.D.

In this verbal threshold matter, we hold, among other things, that by narrowing one of the bodily injury categories contained in the Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act of 1988 (AICRA), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8—that is, by replacing the pre-existing “fractures” category with a “displaced fractures” category — the Legislature did not intend to bar claims based upon only “non-displaced fractures.” Instead, we conclude that the Legislature intended to relegate such a claim to AICRA’s catch-all category that requires proof of “a permanent injury…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  3. Oswin v. ShawSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  4. Shelcusky v. GarjulioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  5. Serrano v. SerranoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. J.M. VS. T.F. (FV-12-2253-16, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API