Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Glazier

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided June 15, 2012No. Civ. No. 11-1393 (RHK/JJK)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

RICHARD H. KYLE, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This case arises out of the alleged use of excessive force against Plaintiff Mark Shane Bishop by Defendant Dale Glazier, a deputy with the Freeborn County, Minnesota Sheriffs Office. Bishop alleges that Glazier’s conduct violated his constitutional rights and Minnesota law. Presently before the Court is Glazier’s Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant the Motion as to Bishop’s constitutional claim and decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his remaining claims.

BACKGROUND

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Grady v. BeckerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API