Legal Opinion · Dissent

Friedlander v. Ariel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 10, 1983Published

1Dissent

Sandler and Carro, JJ.,

dissent in a memorandum by Sandler, J., as follows: The court’s determination granting the motion of the defendant, Doctors Hospital, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint rests upon an erroneous application of the familiar rule that an affidavit by a lawyer lacking personal knowledge of the facts is insufficient to put in issue the factual allegations set forth in the moving papers. On the basis of this misapplied principle, the court has concluded that the plaintiff failed to present a factual issue as to whether June 20, 1978 was the last date that plaintiff…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Friends of Animals, Inc. v. Associated Fur Manufacturers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Indig v. FinkelsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Crawford v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Fonda v. PaulsenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  5. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. SolowNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API